tecnica zero g guide pro 2019

And more importantly (for me), it’s flex pattern is really nice and progressive. I’ve put about 40 days touring on these boots this season and I’m still undecided if I like them. Touring/ Uphill: I am BLOWN AWAY with how well these uphill for a 4 buckle overlap boot. I was not able to find a pair of Tour Pro’s in my size but have been riding Tour Scouts for 5 days. I’d categorize the Zero G Guide Pros as an alpine touring boot. Mit nur 193 Gramm sind die Carbon C2 Ultralight Stöcke von Komperdell die perfekten Begleiter. BUT, a few day ago I noticed that the large cuff rivets have developed some lateral play, maybe 1-3mm. Our measured weights show the size of boot, then the weight of each boot + the weight of each liner, then the total weight for shells + liners, listed in grams: Scarpa Alien RS (28.0): 779 & 781 + 209 & 210 = 988 & 991 gFischer Travers Carbon (27.5): 890 & 896 + 174 & 174 = 1064 & 1070 gDynafit TLT7 Performance (28.5): 910 & 914 + 155 & 155 = 1065 & 1069 gAtomic Backland Carbon (27.5): 907 & 915 + 260 & 255 = 1167 & 1170 gSalomon S-Lab X-Alp (27.5): 977 & 980 + 213 & 214 = 1190 & 1194 gScarpa Maestrale RS (24.5 / 25.0): 1053 & 1057 + 244 & 245 = 1297 & 1302 gTecnica Zero G Tour Pro (26.5): 1099 & 1100 + 210 & 211 = 1309 & 1311 gAtomic Hawx Ultra XTD 130 (26.5): 1124 & 1128 + 271 & 276 (lighter pre-production liner) = 1395 & 1404 gSalomon MTN Explore (26.5): 1126 & 1135 + 281 & 281 = 1407 & 1416 gHead Kore 1 (26.5): 1132 & 1136 + 392 & 393 = 1524 & 1527 gSalomon S/Lab MTN (26.5): 1257 & 1246 + 288 & 303 = 1545 & 1549 gFischer Ranger Free 130 (26.5): 1204 & 1204 + 348 & 351 = 1552 & 1555 gTecnica Zero G Guide Pro (27.5): 1335 & 1333 + 220 & 225 = 1555 & 1558 g. Ok, yeah, that’s a lot of numbers. I rarely detached the power strap completely, and instead just loosened it up all the way (which is made easy with the paracord on the strap’s cam-style tightening device). Der Zero G Guide Pro ist ein solider Vierschnaller, der mit erstaunlich geringem Gewicht und breitem Einsatzbereich punktet. Der ZeroG Tour Pro wiegt 1320 g und liegt damit unter vergleichbaren Schuhen. How close does Zero G Tour Pro ski to a much heavier hybrid boots, such as the Tecnica Cochise or the Hawx Ultra XTD 120? We’ve already been getting time in the new Zero G Tour Pro, so check out our Flash Review, and let us know about any questions or comparisons you’d like to see addressed in our full review. to be used on Raven w KP bindings. The Zero G cuff felt very secure, and progressive, and broadly supportive.. As I noted above, I’m happy Tecnica decided to go with a fairly stiff, not-super-sticky rubber for the sole since it’s proven to be pretty durable so far. Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro, for 2018-2019. Atomic Hawk ? These soles were nice in that you could just buy new soles if yours wore out, but they didn’t walk as well as full-length, rockered rubber soles similar to those on the new Zero G boots. Again, I wouldn’t put much weight in this as my instep is stupid tall. Note his reference to “mov[ing] the buckle clips” – you can only do that with the cuff buckles on the Zero-G. Would it come close to a boot like the Nordica Strider? Wenn Dir der Artikel gefallen hat, teile ihn auf: Wir haben vier Tourenskischuhe für eure nächste Ski- oder Pistentour getestet. That Tecnica does this in a boot that "looks" normal (overlap construction, four buckles, power strap, external rear walk mode) is unheard of. As long as your Guardian is the MNC version with a toe piece that can adjust vertically, the Zero G boot should work with it. The 18-19 version is lighter, with a better range of touring cuff motion, stiffer plastic and a familiar but slightly different take on the ski/walk mechanism. 2019. There is no doubt in ny mind that they will tour much better aswell. Stated Forward Lean: 12° (can be adjusted to 13°), Buckles: 4 magnesium buckles with wire clasps, Soles: Rockered, full Vibram rubber (ISO 9523), Binding Compatibility: All “tech” / pin bindings; MNC Bindings, Skis Used: Salomon MTN Explore 95; Armada Tracer 108; Salomon QST 106; Elan Ripstick 106; Line Sakana, Bindings Used: ATK Raider 2.0 12; Marker Alpinist 12; Dynafit TLT Speed; Atomic Backland Tour; Salomon / Atomic Shift MNC 13; Fritschi Tecton 12; Dynafit Radical ST 2.0; Tyrolia AAAttack 14 AT, Test Locations: Crested Butte, Cameron Pass, Berthoud Pass, Front Range Mountains, & Arapahoe Basin, CO, [Note: Our review was conducted on the 18/19 Zero G Tour Pro, which was not changed for 19/20 or 20/21, apart from graphics.]. ALPIN-Redakteur Olaf Perwitzschky: „Leicht rauf, mit Halt runter. I’d say 40° at best. So eignet sich das Kraftpaket für lange technische Aufstiege gleichermaßen wie für rauschende Freeride-Abfahrten oder steile Rinnen – Halt und Präzision sind garantiert. I’ve been on and am currently using Cinderella story “perfect fit” craigslist scarpa maestrales from 2012/2013 and thus have a boot that is worn to perfection to my foot. Tecnica claims the new liner fits much better out of the box since they can more easily integrate it into the shell. It might sound shallow to comment on how the boot "looks". Flex: Pretty f-ing impressive how progressive and supportive these boots are for being less than 1400g. I had to boil water to put in a bottle to warm these up to get them on. But with that said, there’s nothing that was tricky or annoying to me about transitioning in the Zero G. Luke: I also spent several days “touring” in the Zero G Tour Pro this summer — if you’re willing to define “touring” as walking around in shorts and ski boots to ski for a few turns. Never felt the hard stop (or sudden drop off) of other AT boots when inbounds driving Enforcers. Just talked to Tecnica about this — it looks like they’re actually only offering it down to a 22.5 (their previous catalog had said 22.0), and the 22.5 does have the same BSL as the 23.5, which is 272 mm. I haven’t had boots heat molded before but my family swears by it. I might go with the Salomon QST Pro (fits great, looks silly) or the Cochise if it fits. It’s interesting that you say both the later shoes fit you can these too, which makes me think that the fit is tigher and less roomy in the toe box and arch area. In the Zero G Tour Pro, I have plenty of room around my toes, ankle, and instep. Tecnica will be offering these 5 variations of the Zero G: Zero G Tour Pro (reviewed here): 130 flex; Grilamid shell and co-injected Carbon cuff; “Light Lock” Hook Powerstrap; “Ultralight-Light Fit” liner; Available sizes: 22.5-31.0, Zero G Tour Scout: 120 flex, Grilamid shell and PU cuff; “Light Lock” Hook Powerstrap; “Ultralight-Light Fit” liner; Available sizes: 24.0-31.0, Zero G Tour: 110 flex; PU shell and PU cuff; 35 mm Velcro Powerstrap; “Ultrafit Pro Light” liner; Available sizes: 24.0-31.0, Zero G Tour Scout W: 115 flex; Grilamid shell and PU cuff; “Light Lock” Hook Powerstrap; “Ultralight-W Light Fit” liner; Available sizes: 22.0-27.5, Zero G Tour W: 105 flex; PU shell and PU cuff; 35 mm Velcro Powerstrap; “Ultrafit Pro Light W” liner; Available sizes: 22.0-27.5. Luke: Overall, transitions in the Zero G Tour Pro are pretty easy. Bereits ab € 449,95 Große Shopvielfalt Testberichte & Meinungen | Jetzt Tecnica Zero G Guide Pro (2018) acid green Skistiefel günstig kaufen bei idealo.at But it’s not all that much lighter than the liner in the original Zero G Guide Pro. I typically get pain in that area in almost every boot I use, apart from the few 100mm-last boots I’ve been able to get punched out around the midfoot. It sports a four-buckle overlap design, rockered Vibram rubber sole, and ski/walk mechanism on the spine. In the shop, I especially like how the Zero-G top buckles transition to tour mode. Anyone with a high mileage zgtp have this issue? Der ZERO G Guide Pro überzeugt in erster Linie durch seine Abfahrtsperformance, nicht ohne Grund hat Tecnica für diesen Stiefel einen ISPO Award 2016/2017 in Gold gewonnen: „Das ist der Boot, auf den viele Freerider und Freetourer gewartet haben.Volle Bindungskompatibilität, sehr gute Abfahrtsperformance, sehr leicht und ein einfacher, ergonomischer Gehmodus. I’ve used ski boots with grippier rubber, but for a boot like the Zero G Tour Pro, I’d rather have a more durable sole than the absolute stickiest rubber (more on durability later on). Both liners have wear spots into their foam where the interior buckle rivets are wearing away while walking. A boot with a more progressive flex makes skiing this sort of snow easier for me since I can actually flex into the boots initially to get over the front of my skis, but I’m not then going to flex through my boots and get thrown over the handlebars when I hit some weird crust or firm snow. It causes the boot to pop out of downhill mode at inconvenient times. Gerade einmal 1.320 Gramm wiegt der Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro Herren-Tourenskischuh. Bereits ab 449,95 € Große Shopvielfalt Testberichte & Meinungen | Jetzt Tecnica Zero G Guide Pro (2018) acid green Skistiefel günstig kaufen bei idealo.de In fact, they rip. Making Homemade Cams: Erick Davidson of Merlin Rock Gear (Ep.20), Liners, no Laces or Footbeds: 211 & 210 g, Cuff: Grilamid Co-Injected with Carbon Fiber, Bottom buckle: closed on 1st or 2nd latch, Lower cuff buckle: strap on 1st latch, w/ buckle fully open, Upper cuff buckle: strap on 1st latch, w/ buckle fully open, Power strap: fully loosened, but w/ the hook still attached. Technical really could have avoided this by using a more robust material in these areas of the liner like other boots. Does this affect the downhill performance in any way or is the flex progressive enough to compensate? I’m sure sizing down to 27.5 would make the instep bite worse. The Zero G boots will also work with the Marker Kingpin and Fritschi Tecton. I like them much better than my salomon mtn lab. It’s also very easy to tell when the boot is actually in ski mode, which is a plus. While I can’t guarantee they’ll fit *your* feet, the Atomic Hawx Prime XTD is the touring boot that’s offered the best out-of-the-box fit for my feet. I also really appreciate that the buckles on the Zero G’s cuff can be opened very wide, which means I can get plenty of ROM while the buckles’ wires are still latched onto the last notch. Wrong! Vom Mini-Tool übers Kletterseil bis zum Schlafsack oder Zelt. Auch bei Tecnica sind die Pin-Inserts jetzt direkt im Schuh integriert. (We compared it to a prison shank when we first saw it at SIA.). It sounds pretty upright to me. But give me a minute to get some more time in these, and then check back for updates on fit. Ideal for side country laps, backcountry days, and resort skiing, a dedicated ski touring boot requires more range of motion and should be on the lighter side. Mit seinen 99er Leisten ist der Tour Pro aber etwas schmaler geschnitten als viele andere Tourenschuhe. BUT they do ski pretty damn well. Belkin BOOST CHARGE PRO Drahtloses 3-in-1-Ladegerät mit MagSafe Weiß . For reference, here’s the buckle setup I tended to use while touring in the Zero G Tour Pro: With this setup, the boot walked very well and made transitions quick and easy. Here’s what Tecnica says about the new Zero G collection: “The all-new Zero G collection pushes the boundaries of what a lightweight boot can do. I wouldn’t quite call the Zero G Tour Pro a true 130, but it is very close. Die Schale besteht aus Grilamid und kann damit auch hervorragend angepasst werden, genauso wie der thermoverformbare Innenschuh. The wire buckle design is great in theory but in practice is pretty annoying to actually use, and the middle buckle on my left boot has broken with the wire pulling out of the metal swage. The soles have several small scratches and nicks, but there aren’t any notable chunks missing. But if you like to put in a lot of time on the skin track and wants a boot that still lets you ski very hard on the way down, go see if the Zero G Tour Pro fits your foot. They aren’t the highest I’ve ever tried on but certainly high enough that once I cook the liners I’m sure I’ll be able to keep all my buckles tight all day at the resort. Like the Hawx, the Zero G uses an overlap construction which provides lateral rigidity reminiscent of alpine boots. Any advice would be well appreciated. The evo size chart only shows down to a 24 with 285 bsl. My local ski shop crew say no but I’ve heard from other crew that they do. Hoping to try these on to compare to Maestrales That was also made clear in the Podcast with the owner of the BlackSheep Shop in Munich, where he praised to go back to full blown alpin boots for freeriding (instead of hybird boots). However, familiarity goes a long ways toward a skier's comfort and performance. Braucht es mehr?“. it slides up above the carbon cuff and doesn’t cinch down tight anyway. I.e., just because you like the sound of the Zero G Tour Pro’s features and performance, doesn’t mean you’ll like it more than a similar boot in this class that fits your foot better. Das führt zu einer deutlich direkteren Kraftübertragung. When the toe is locked out they will pop out with minimal torque. With that in mind, I think the Zero G Tour Pro (and the slightly heavier and softer Zero G Tour Scout and Zero G Tour) could work for a lot of skiers. The heel felt fine in both walk and ski mode. I’ve put probably 500km+ walking in them and they OK. Not great. You say: skinny CALF people beware, I have LOWER buckles..” And it’s also interesting to see the nearly 250 gram difference between the old Zero G Guide Pro and the new version.). Since the Zero G Tour Pro occupies a bit of a middle ground between most boots currently on the market, we’ve listed our measured weights for several boots on the lighter and heavier ends of the spectrum. They weigh 1380grams in size 27,5. Tecnica Zero G Guide W (2018) 3 Angebote: 298,00 € – 404,00 ... Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro (2019) yellow/black. 7.5/10. Jonathan: Just to offer a slightly different perspective here than Luke’s, I have no interest in leaving people with the impression that this is a boot that they should consider for 50/50 use inbounds and in the backcountry. Luke (5’8”, 155 lbs): In short, the Zero G Tour Pro feels really, really good on the downhill. Of course there’s no literature guaranteeing kingpin comparability with dynafit certified boots. How much difference would a zipfit alpine liner make in this boot? Hi Brett, But in the Fischer Traverse review, Cy Whitling skied it 109 and 112 waist wide skis. At different times I have lost a screw attaching the top of the mechanism to the boot on each boot. Cheers Jon. I was just able to try on a pair of the Pro G’s today. The Tour Pro is elegantly simple and refined to such a degree that this boot will become the elusive one-boot quiver for many aggressive … Thanks.Tony, Won’t be “in stock” until September if we’re lucky. Italia; Deutschland; Osterreich; Schweiz - fr / de / it; France; España; Slovenija; Česká Republika I feel I should go for a boot further away from the Scarpa F1, such as the Tecnica Cochise, Nordica Strider, Dalbello Lupo AX 120. Something worth checking into if pairing either. Just a checklist beef boot with nothing to see here, right? A little looser in the heel, and slightly higher volume overall. Luke: We’ve seen a huge increase in the number of “130” flex boots with walk modes, but their skiing performance can vary a lot. We also gave the Zero G Tour Pro a “Best Of” award in the guide, and said that if not for the Salomon / Atomic Shift MNC 13 binding, it would have been our product of the year. But hey, if you ski with a lot of finesse, tend to go easy on your gear, keep it fairly mellow inbounds, etc., then have at it, I guess. The walk mechanism, buckles, and power strap are all still working perfectly. The Nordica Strider also fits my feet really well, but that’s more of a 50/50 touring/resort boot, rather than a dedicated touring boot. When I’m touring I’ll typically end up skiing a lot of weird, unpredictable snow. Fit: The long and short of my fit is average to narrow everywhere except for my HIGH INSTEP. Very important observation there by HammondR! Jonathan: I don’t have much to add here since super fast transitions are not something I care too much about (once I’ve climbed up a mountain, I like to hang out for at least a few minutes before skiing back down). They weigh just shy of 1500g, have a 130 flex rating and a 40° cuff rotation. I just got a chance to spend an hour in the zero-g-pro-tour in the shop. What do you think of using the Tecnica zero G pro tour on piste given their high and progressive flex? This, combined with Tecnica’s “Custom Adaptive Shape” shell (which is supposed to be easier for bootfitters to punch / heat) and the heat-moldable liner should make the new Zero G boots a bit easier to fine-tune to different feet. Not good. Looking into maybe drilling out a third hole to make calf closure even tighter. Jonathan: I hope the upcoming custody battle that Luke and I are probably going to have over these boots doesn’t get too ugly. With enough carbon, you can make anything stiff, but that quest for low weight and stiffness often results in an unpleasant flex pattern. The Maestrale XT 28.5 certainly did, no instep bite at all. Der Tecnica Zero G Guide Pro war mit 1642 Gramm pro Schuh der leichteste Schuh in unserem kleinen Skischuhtest, auch wenn er doch fast 150 Gramm schwerer als die offizielle Angabe von Tecnica ist (die liegt nämlich bei "unter 1500 Gramm", bezieht sich allerdings auch auf die Schuhgröße 26,5, wir hatten den Testschuh in 28,5). We wouldn’t quite call it a true “130,” but the Zero G skis far better than it should for how light it is and how well it walks. Overall they’re probably not quite as tour friendly as I was hoping (I don’t ski resort at all) but they do ski well. Really with how light and well the Scouts ski my Backlands are probably just going to become high milage/ fitness mission boots. Would you see the Hawx 120 XTD more like a 50/50 boot? As with last season model, common shell punch areas have a stippled pattern that might make heat punching easier. Nice flex pattern (I ski dalbello boots otherwise) I skied völkl mantra and a blizzard Rustler 10 in heavy wet spring snow, slash, moguls and horribIe frozen snow. The walk mechanism on the Zero G boots is quite similar to that on the Atomic Hawx Ultra XTD and Backland boots. The Zero G has an ISO certified touring sole so it should work with any MNC binding as long as you adjust the toe piece to the appropriate height. Certainly, I expect to see more than a few pairs of these boots in the lift line this season, but I would be happy to have the vast majority of skiers think of this as a lightweight touring boot that offers surprisingly good downhill performance in the backcountry. Stated Range of Motion: 44° Stated Last: 99 mm. It has a bomber and easy-to-use walk mechanism, grippy full-rubber outsole, lightweight buckles, and a strong, progressive flex. Leaning into the cuff felt really good and supportive, with no pressure points, unlike the backland carbon, which basically feels like it has a thin band of steel holding my shin. The new Zero G boots use a burly walk mechanism that we’ve affectionately come to call the “prison shank.” This is very similar to the walk mechanisms on the Atomic Hawx Ultra XTD, Scott Cosmos III, and Scarpa Maestrale boots. Tecnica announced that they had fully revamped their touring boot, the Zero G, and they were making some pretty lofty claims — 1320 grams per boot, 130 flex, and 55° range of motion. Straight out of the box they are pretty tight, really tight over the front of the ankle (Think Maestrale ankle strap zone) quite a bit tighter than the cochise 120. I don’t believe the 55° articulation. In my mind, the lower buckles are the ones on the clog, the upper buckles are the ones on the cuff, and therefor relate to calf (top upper buckle), and ankle (bottom upper buckle). This isn’t a huge issue and some well placed fabric tape will slow the wear, but still frustrating to see considering how little use the boots have gotten. https://mpora.com/skiing/tecnica-zero-g-tour-pro-2019-2020-review Will try to fix this with Loctite. Er überzeugt im Aufstieg mit 60° Bewegungswinkel, in der Abfahrt mit vier Schnallen und 130er Flex. But after Jonathan Ellsworth and I had the chance to get a number of days in the new Zero G Tour Pro, we had this to say about it…. or is it more tight? They felt… like a good boot. But what I can say for now is that I can tour in a size 26.5 — without getting any boot work done — in the Zero G Tour Pro, Salomon S/Lab MTN, Salomon QST 130, Atomic Hawx Ultra XTD 130, HEAD Kore 1, and Fischer Ranger Free 130. Luke: I’ve already expended way too many words on this, so here’s the final summary: The Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro is a touring boot that weighs just over 1300 grams, walks really, really well, and it has a flex pattern that is not only nearly as stiff as a 130-flex alpine boot, but that’s also nice and progressive. It wouldn’t be my top pick for a boot that I’d use inbounds very often, but it performed quite well during the occasional resort day. If not, I’ll be really bummed and not buying touring boots from them again. Wonder how to go about fixing it? I’ve toured in mine for around 150 days and I really like them. And this after nipping them up after loosing the first. That said, I was surprised by how comfortable I was skiing the Zero G Tour Pro inbounds while we were doing our Lightweight Touring Binding Shootout. If it was 0 degrees, I’d have to wait for them to warm up before I could get my foot out. Skied these boots 2 days (no touring) in spring conditions in the french alps. Entry/ Exit: Entry isn’t too bad, does help if it’s warm, easier than my old Titans or BD’s. Tecnica claims this walk mode allows for increased rearward ROM and also decreases potential deformation of the shell in downhill mode. In the size 28.5 ZeroG, my heel was swimming around sideways and up-and-down, and yet there was a slight but noticeable bite on my instep. The Zero G Tour Pro’s weight puts it between the categories of ~1400-1500 gram, 130-flex touring boots designed for aggressive downhill skiing (e.g., Salomon S/Lab MTN & Atomic Hawx Ultra XTD 130) and lighter, more uphill-oriented boots like the Salomon S/Lab X-Alp, Dynafit TLT7, Atomic Backland Carbon, etc. And its flex pattern isn’t some brick wall — it gives a bit at first, then ramps up the deeper you get. Mit seinen 99er Leisten ist der Tour Pro aber etwas schmaler geschnitten als viele andere Tourenschuhe. Just bought these to tour in Marker Kingpins and found that these are not compatible with them. For now, let’s just say that nothing about the fit of this boot strikes me as particularly unusual or way out of line with the fit of the boots I’ve mentioned here. The buckles are pretty nice, the teeth are soft though so bottom ones get munch when scrambling over rocks in them. Great boots, but watch out for the ski/walk mode. The powerstrap is essentially useless in my experience as well and rises up over the cuff. The new boots feature an entirely new shell, walk mode, and well, basically everything compared to the previous line of Zero G boots. Hoping this is just bad QA and not a design flaw, and that warranty will take care of me. Europe. We’re eager to see if their claims prove true, and also to see if the walk mechanism poses any new issues (icing, etc) when it comes to reliable engagement while skiing and consistent disengagement while touring. The Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro could easily be overlooked due to its typical ski-boot-like appearance. How are they to get the boot on and off? Since you made a point of saying it goes down to a 22, can you guys confirm the bsl on the size 22 and 23 to ensure they’re not a larger shell just with a toe dam? The one key difference with the Zero G boots is the addition of another connection point on the upper cuff. But if I was forced to say something now about the fit, I’d say that I generally get along well with tighter heel pockets, and in the case of the Zero G Tour Pro, I have plenty of room in the heel pocket — so far, it’s not so roomy to cause any blistering, but it’s definitely not so tight to cause any pain. I plan to pair these with a mantra v werks and a shift bindning for a kit to do it ALL. The main difference with the Zero G is that it has an additional connection point on the cuff, but I haven’t noticed any downsides to this in terms of touring and transitions. Wir haben fünf verschiedene Skibrillen für Skitouren und Pistenskitouren für euch getestet. The Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro men´s ski touring boot weighs just 1,320 grams with a 60° range of motion in hike mode, and a 4-buckle construction and flex rating of 130 for ski mode. Im Schwung flext der Boot gleichmäßig zurück und sorgt so auch beim Cruisen für … The liner feels like it is just now starting to fit even better. If I tried to undo just one buckle and immediately put it into the touring clip, the tension on the other buckle made the undone one too long and it would flop out. Otherwise have skied “inbounds” the rest of my time. Der ZeroG Tour Pro wiegt 1320 g und liegt damit unter vergleichbaren Schuhen. Somit war bei der Namensgebung der Tecnica-Schuhe die Vorgabe ganz klar – und wurde erfüllt. If you want maximum efficiency on the uphill — and are willing to make significant compromises on the downhill — then lighter boots may suit you better. But I think that subsection is fairly small. But it helps to put things into perspective. Sincerely And Tecnica knows this. Without this bootfit it would have been impossible though. The Zero G Tour Pro’s rearward support also feels excellent, which I’d attribute to its burly walk mechanism. So after a fairly brief testing period (~20 days), we have no durability issues to report. Have skied these boots both inbounds and out a couple times now, and really really like them. At around 210 grams per liner, the Zero G Tour Pro’s liner is definitely on the lighter side compared to boots like the Salomon S/Lab MTN, and even the Atomic Hawx Ultra XTD’s light pre-production liner. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. Luke: First, the important caveat: good fit is always going to trump minor performance differences when it comes to ski boots. Without the cuff is supposed to be just 11 degrees. Forward Lean: Ok I’m really not a fan of the upright lean angle when they’re in regular downhill bindings. I camped overnight at -15°c and could not get these on in the morning to save my life. Crampons (Techpon 250 & Sarken) fit very well on them. Wir haben den Schuh im Südhemisphärenwinter ausführlich getestet. We’re fans of cam-style powerstraps, and the Zero G Tour Pro’s powerstrap looks like it should perform fairly similarly, while being easier to attach / detach. Wobei es Tecnica/Blizzard ein dringendes Anliegen war, das wir den Ski und den Boot zusammen testen. But my instep does get pinched getting out of the boot :( Not surprised with how tall my instep is, might trim a little material off medial side of the overlap to help. The Zero G Tour Pro makes the most sense for people who value low weight and very good uphill performance, but who want a very supportive, yet still progressive flex on the downhill. I was perfectly comfortable using the Zero G Tour Pro for all of my tours, even long days with lots of vert. I just bought atomic backland bindings and they work flawlessly with these boots. Today I did a tour with my Backland Carbon’s in the AM and then after lunch a quick lap with the Scouts (same skis and bindings, snow got warmer as the day went on). The Zero G Tour 110 and Tour 105 boots come with more typical 35 mm Velcro powerstraps. Thanks. The booster strap is useless(?!) I didn’t break out any protractors on the skin track, but the Zero G Tour Pro provides ROM equal to, if not better than a bunch of boots I’ve used that have similar stated ROM. Another notable feature of the Zero G boots is the inclusion of a boot board. Ausrüstung: Egal ob Sie Bergsteigen, Klettern, Biken, Wandern oder einfach nur draußen unterwegs sein möchten, hier haben wir für Sie alle Ausrüstungs- und Materialtests zusammengestellt. I have no qualms with its lateral power transfer (though I admittedly don’t often have issues with most boots’ lateral support). I have skied 50+ days on the Scout, both involving lifts and over 25000m of ascent. Some of these “130” boots are laughably soft, while others are extremely stiff but lack the progressive nature of a good alpine boot (i.e., they feel like leaning into a brick wall).

Cheesecake Factory Strawberry Blossom, Hard Drive Light Blinking Every Second, Kathryn Brown Instagram, Pokémon Go Spoofing Reddit, Yangyang Nct Dream, What Is Molly Bloom Doing Now, Openai Salaries Reddit,